In the early 1900s over 90% of the UK population lived in Private rented accommodation with just under 10% of the population living as owner occupier.
The early 90s saw stark contrast to this with a dramatic
drop to 9% of PRS occupation compared with 70% owner occupied.
Over the last 30 years the PRS has seen a steady rise, while
owner occupation has somewhat plateau at 63%.
Currently just over 20% of the population (4.6m) live in
private rented accommodation, but with a cost of living crisis coupled with low
minimum wage and a 4th year freeze on housing benefit are low income
households being forced out of central towns and cities.
A recent report published by Urban Big data Centre found
that for the ten largest cities, it is estimated that one-in-nine low-income
PRS households was displaced in just eight years as a result which is 15,000
households in total.
Contrary to popular belief the Government encouraged this
re-growth because they recognise the sector provides an important source housing
which is greatly lacking in the social sector along with greater flexibility
for those that need quick access to accommodation without long-term
commitments.
After the Second World War the growth of social housing
boomed and it was assumed that most low-income families would expect to find
secure housing within this sector, but with the decline in social housing stock
from the mid 90s onward, low-income families now faced added pressure of rising
costs are now turning to the PRS for safe secure housing because the social
sector is gravely lacking.
Twin forces of economic regeneration and gentrification have
played the main part in the shift from affordable to non-affordable housing,
with the latter seeing an influx of more affluent residents into poorer
neighbourhoods with both positive and negative effects for the current
low-income residents. Much conversation has been generated around whether
gentrification is merely the displacing of low-income residents from inner
cities, instead of helping them through regeneration of their local area, with
improvements to transport links and increasing employment opportunities
Factors such as welfare reform and the commercialisation of
social housing have had a hand in low-income individuals to be displaced from
their traditional inner city neighbourhoods, with potentially important
implications for access to employment.
But sadly, the increase in costs is not just effecting
tenants, landlords are feeling the pinch too with increase in agency fees,
mortgage costs and a rise in insurance coupled with a sharp growth in the costs
of trades landlords have been forced to increase rents in some cases just to
break even.
In addition the rental market has been flooded with former
would-be first time buyer who are now themselves unable to get a mortgage
surging into the rental market, being able to provide lump sum rent upfront
sometimes as much as 12 months at a time, together with a rise in rents is
pushing low income families further and further away from town and city centres
and into more affordable rural areas, where there are fewer jobs and more
demand for school places.
Over the last 4 years we have seen increasing restrictions
on the subsidies available to lower income families to help pay rents.
In the years leading up to the pandemic, increases in
Housing benefits levels known as the Local Housing Allowance were restricted to
levels well below rental inflation rates so that poorer households were
restricted to an ever decreasing section of the PRS market.
In 2012/13, 20% of listings on Zoopla were affordable for
those on Housing Benefit. By 2019/20, this had fallen to just 9%
The example below is correct for live rental figures as at
the week of publication of this article.
Location |
Property
Type |
Median
rent P/M |
LHA rate |
Difference |
Liverpool |
1 Bed |
£725 |
£398 |
-£327 |
|
3 Bed |
£995 |
£523 |
-£472 |
Birmingham |
1 Bed |
£950 |
£523 |
-£427 |
|
3 Bed |
£1,350 |
£673 |
-£677 |
Oxford |
1 Bed |
£1,625 |
£773 |
-£852 |
|
3 Bed |
£2,250 |
£1,096 |
-£1,154 |
Central London |
1 Bed |
£2,383 |
£1,280 |
-£1,103 |
|
3 Bed |
£4,950 |
£1,914 |
-£3,036 |
Devon |
1 Bed |
£772 |
£423 |
-£349 |
|
3 Bed |
£1,477 |
£648 |
-£829 |
We can see from the above table that Local Housing Allowance
is no longer covering the lowest rents, with unrealistic differences between
what rents are and the LHA available to tenants The continued freeze for Housing
Benefit levels, combined with the rising costs of inner-city renting, is
engineering a fundamental change in the social fabric of our cities.
We need to examine the impacts this has on the welfare of
poorer households as they are pushed to locations which tend to have worse
public transport, and worse access to jobs and vital services.
But we also need to be asking whether this is the kind of
city we wish to create – one marked by deepening spatial divisions between
richer and poorer.