In recent months there has been a noticeable increased demand in the BTL investment market for tenanted properties, this could be linked to the fact that tenants are renting for the longer term now and regarding properties as their home rather than a stop gap.
Leeds and Bristol showed the highest
increase in demand with 55%, closely followed by Nottingham 51%, Cambridge 47%
and Southampton with a 40% increase in demand.
However, the market is slow to catch
up with demand, with Leeds only having 2.9% of properties on the market which
are tenanted, Bristol 0.7%, Cambridge 1.8% and Southampton 1.6%.
In contrast Cardiff has the highest
number of tenanted properties on the market for sale at 3.7% with a demand
increase of only 38%.
Buying a property with a tenant in
situ also referred to as a sitting tenant, can bring a number of benefits to
the BTL investor.
Firstly, there will be no void period
after the sale when you would normally be advertising for a tenant, this in
turn will mean a saving on agency fees.
You inherit a reliable, trustworthy
tenant which is extremely valuable to any landlord and you are guaranteed rental
income from day one, you will be able to budget with confidence, knowing the
rent you will receive until at least the end of the existing tenancy agreement
in addition you will have access to the tenants full rental history something you
may not get when using a referencing firm with a new tenant.
With a contract in place, tenants need
not be affected at all by a change in the ownership of a rental property,
ensuring their happiness and willingness to remain in their home is undiminished.
But it isn’t as simple as it sounds,
nothing in property ever is.
It is important to remember when
buying with a tenant in situ, the tenant will be entitled to continue to live
in the property and the change of ownership does not override the tenancy agreement
and the tenant’s rights.
You will not be able to evict or
increase rents until a fixed term tenancy ends and depending on when the tenant
took up occupation, you may find you have a Protected tenancy which brings its
own problems
Buying a property with tenants in situ
is different to the normal sales process and will need a conveyancer with
commercial experience.
Extra care is needed as in addition to
the standard enquiries that need to be made in all conveyancing transactions,
it is critical to make enquiries about the tenants.
It is important the seller provides
all the details relating to the tenant, including the Tenancy Agreement this is
key to establish when the tenancy was created, the status of the tenants and
how they may be regulated by legislation, as different forms of security apply
to different tenancies.
You will also need to ensure the seller
has been compliant and how this will impact you as the buyer, checking the
original deposit has been registered and after the sale transferring it to your
name, you will need to protect it
again, and reissue the prescribed information.
Making sure the property meets safety
regulations and all the necessary certificates are in place, such as energy
performance, gas and electrical.
(if furnished) that the furniture is
in an acceptable condition and meets safety standards.
In an
industry where there is a notice for just about everything, it is important to familiarise
yourself with the notices and their timelines that will need to be served on
the tenants once the property is purchased.
Section
3 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
Section 3 places a mandatory duty on a new landlord to tell
the tenant that they are in fact the new owner, having taken over from the old
one, this is still the case even if the seller has already informed the tenant.
The new owner must give this notice no later than next rent
due date or 2 months from the date of sale, it must inform the tenant that they
are the new landlord and must provide their name and address (this must be the
landlord’s actual address, not just an address for service of documents).
Important caveats
If the new landlord has not served a S3 notice on the tenant
then the previous owner remains liable for any breaches of the tenancy
agreement, such as disrepair, until the notice is given, in addition both the old and the new landlord can be held
jointly and severally liable for any breach.
More importantly S3(3) states A
person who is the new landlord under a tenancy falling within subsection (1)
and who fails, without reasonable excuse to give the notice required by that
subsection, commits a summary offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not
exceeding level 4 on the standard scale.
In short this means being prosecuted
in the Magistrates court and the scale 4 fine is currently £2,500.
Section 47 of the Landlord and Tenant
Act 1987
S47 requires that any written demand
for rent by the landlord to the tenant, must include the landlord’s name and
residential address and if that address is not in England and Wales, an address
within England and Wales is required, so notices can be served. The purpose of
the requirement under Section 47 is not to give the tenant information as to
where the notices can be served, but to confirm the identity of the landlord.
Using a managing agent’s address does not confirm the landlord’s identity, as
it is not the landlord’s actual address.
Section 48 of the Landlord and Tenant
Act 1987
Section 48 of the Act prevents
landlords being able to seek possession of the property on grounds of rent
arrears until the tenant has been provided with an address at which notices in
proceedings can be served and the tenant will not be liable to pay rent until
the landlord complies.
Interestingly S48 does not state that
the landlord’s personal address is required for the amounts to become due. So a
landlord can seek possession of a property on rent arrears grounds or the
arrears themselves if he has provided an address at which notices and
proceedings can be served. This address can be the landlord’s own address, that
of the landlord’s letting agent, solicitor or friend. The address can also be a
business address, preferably a registered office.
Finally, if a tenant has already paid rent
on a defective rent demand, he or she may well be able to claw back up to six
years’ payments on the basis that they were paid under an invalid demand.
No comments:
Post a Comment